Guidance for editors and reviewers for Cell Reviews (Marseille, France)

Editorial instructions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70296/cr-1h0kkjgwzx

Keywords:

editorial advisors, editors, reviewers, evaluations, manuscripts, guidelines

Abstract

Scholarly publishing in life science requires implications of internal and external experts in the evaluation and improvement of articles. This role is mainly played by the editorial s and peer-reviewers. Here are proposed some guidance for a consistent and objective reviewing of the manuscript submitted for publication in Cell Reviews. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dr Adama Sidibé, Rviews Press, Marseille, France

    -Editor-in-chief of the Rviews Press Open Access journals:

    • Cell Reviews,
    • Cell Biology
    • Cell Method

    -Founder of Rviews Press to propose rigorous, transparent and rapid scholarly publishing experience.

    Rviews Press participates in the Network of Public Knowledge Project (PKP) services for improved editorial process and workflow.

References

COPE COPE: Committee on Publication Eth-ics. COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/.

SFU-PKP PKP Preservation Network. Public Knowledge Project. https://pkp.sfu.ca/pkp-pn/.

Creative Commons Deed - Attribution 4.0 In-ternational - Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1.

Editorial informations for editors and reviewers

Published

2024-07-21 — Updated on 2024-08-31

Versions

How to Cite

Sidibé, A. (2024) “Guidance for editors and reviewers for Cell Reviews (Marseille, France): Editorial instructions”, Cell Reviews, 1(1), pp. 16–23. doi:10.70296/cr-1h0kkjgwzx.