Guidance for editors and reviewers for Cell Reviews (Marseille, France)
Editorial instructions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70296/cr-1h0kkjgwzxKeywords:
editorial advisors, editors, reviewers, evaluations, manuscripts, guidelinesAbstract
Scholarly publishing in life science requires implications of internal and external experts in the evaluation and improvement of articles. This role is mainly played by the editorial s and peer-reviewers. Here are proposed some guidance for a consistent and objective reviewing of the manuscript submitted for publication in Cell Reviews.
Downloads
References
COPE COPE: Committee on Publication Eth-ics. COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/.
SFU-PKP PKP Preservation Network. Public Knowledge Project. https://pkp.sfu.ca/pkp-pn/.
Creative Commons Deed - Attribution 4.0 In-ternational - Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1.

Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-08-31 (2)
- 2024-07-21 (1)
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr Adama Sidibé (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2024 The author, Rviews Press Marseille, France. All right reserved including those for text, images, AI training and AI-like technologies. The articles published in Cell Reviews are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY)